SSubida Skills

Esc to close · results from all notes, skills and people

Mobile apps›Organic growth

Pricing influencer deals — RPM cap, flat rates and minimum view clauses

How Cal AI priced creator deals — never pay a CPM above your revenue per 1,000 views, base rates on a creator's average (not best) views, prefer flat rates to keep the viral upside, and use a minimum view clause set below what the creator claims.

Updated 2026-10-24·2 sources·organic-growthinfluencer-marketingcreator-paycpmunit-economicscal-ai

Pricing influencer deals — RPM cap, flat rates, minimum view clauses

TL;DR

  • Compute revenue per 1,000 views (RPM) per niche; never pay a CPM above it — that guarantees a loss.1
  • Set the rate from the creator’s expected (average) views, aiming at break-even or small profit.23
  • The real profit is in the occasional mega-viral post; flat-rate deals let you keep that asymmetric upside.23
  • If a creator insists on a number ($1,000/month), meet it and raise deliverables instead.4
  • Minimum view clause: the creator says “I can easily get 1M” — agree, and write in a floor around 700–800K. Profitable for you, easy for them.56
  • Jake still paid unrequested bonuses in good months.7

Details

The RPM ceiling (Jake Castillo). Find how much you make per 1,000 views in that niche; the CPM you pay must be below it. Many creators will refuse, and you let them go.1 How to measure RPM is in Measuring creator and UGC attribution (RPM, spikes, vanity URLs, codes).

Why flat rates. Influencer and UGC returns are driven by viral hits. Price on average views; the viral post is pure profit. Per-view pay hands that upside to the creator.23

Negotiating.48

  • Creators who get their cash number usually care less about deliverables, so trade volume for price.
  • Get on calls and act like “a regular person”, not a sleazy agent; when the math doesn’t work, decline kindly and refer them to a better-fit brand.

Minimum view clause (Alfie Dickens). Creators always claim 1–2M views a video, which only happens when a post overperforms. Alfie accepted the claim and added a guaranteed floor a couple of hundred thousand below it, framed as “so you hit it every month without stress”. Creators usually agreed, having just set the bar themselves.56

CPM over time. At first Cal AI aimed for very low CPMs because nobody knew the app and viewers need several exposures (the “seven touches” rule). As awareness grew, each view converted better, so it could pay more per deal.910

Market drift. Both say rates rose by 2026: more brands chasing the same creators, and agents on creators with only 5–10K views a video. Alfie says $1–2 CPM influencer deals got much harder in the last six months, which pushed teams towards UGC.1112

Disagreements / caveats

See also

Footnotes

  1. How Cal AI turned creators into a growth machine — Jake Castillo, Cal AI @ 33:00 — Jake Castillo ↩ ↩2

  2. How Cal AI turned creators into a growth machine — Jake Castillo, Cal AI @ 30:16 — Jake Castillo ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  3. How Cal AI turned creators into a growth machine — Jake Castillo, Cal AI @ 31:12 — Jake Castillo ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  4. How Cal AI turned creators into a growth machine — Jake Castillo, Cal AI @ 34:10 — Jake Castillo ↩ ↩2

  5. Meet The Marketing Genius Behind Cal AI @ 09:35 — Alfie Dickens ↩ ↩2

  6. Meet The Marketing Genius Behind Cal AI @ 10:24 — Alfie Dickens ↩ ↩2

  7. How Cal AI turned creators into a growth machine — Jake Castillo, Cal AI @ 32:04 — Jake Castillo ↩

  8. How Cal AI turned creators into a growth machine — Jake Castillo, Cal AI @ 35:15 — Jake Castillo ↩

  9. Meet The Marketing Genius Behind Cal AI @ 11:43 — Alfie Dickens ↩

  10. Meet The Marketing Genius Behind Cal AI @ 13:06 — Alfie Dickens ↩

  11. How Cal AI turned creators into a growth machine — Jake Castillo, Cal AI @ 46:27 — Jake Castillo ↩

  12. Meet The Marketing Genius Behind Cal AI @ 47:58 — Alfie Dickens ↩