SSubida Skills

Esc to close · results from all notes, skills and people

Am I underpriced? Reading price from sales close rate

Hormozi's close-rate-to-price ladder for offers sold by a salesperson (80%+ close → 3–4x underpriced, 30–40% → priced right, <30% → fix avatar/sales motion first) and why matching a cheaper competitor cost him ~$50M.

Updated 2026-10-24·2 sources·pricingsalesclose-rateoffersservices

Am I underpriced? Reading price from sales close rate

TL;DR

  • Applies to offers closed by a salesperson (phone, Zoom, in person) — not checkout pages.
  • Close rate ≥80% → ~3–4x underpriced; 60–80% → 2–3x; 50–60% → 1.5–2x; 40–50% → 1.25–1.5x; 30–40% → about right.
  • Below 30%: fix the avatar (wrong buyer) or the sales motion before you consider cutting price.
  • Services only go one way on price — up. SaaS is the exception, because price trades gross margin against growth.
  • Don’t match a cheaper competitor. When Hormozi did, churn didn’t move and he lost ~$6–7M a year in profit.

Details

The ladder. Alex Hormozi’s rule of thumb is that if 4 out of 5 people you pitch buy, you’re charging a third to a quarter of what you could. The gaps shrink as close rates fall: 60–80% means 2–3x underpriced, 50–60% means 1.5–2x, 40–50% means 1.25–1.5x.1 He calls 30–40% “appropriately priced”, but only if the sales motion already educates the buyer before the call (content, VSL), so the call is just personalisation and the decision. If you close 35% without that pre-education, there’s probably still a 2–3x price increase available once you build it.2

Under 30%. Check the avatar and the sales process first. Pushing for a price cut is usually a sign of a weak sales culture or a scared founder.2

Why services ratchet up. About 80% of businesses don’t scale without people. Once you get good, demand outruns capacity, so you raise prices. Higher prices bring better margins, better hires and better customers: a virtuous loop. Serving more people for less runs the same loop the other way. SaaS is the exception, since a lower price can speed up growth, so the trade-off is real there.3

The undercut lesson (Gym Launch). A competitor recruited Gym Launch’s top testimonial clients and sold cheaper one-on-one coaching. Hormozi responded by giving his existing recurring base more value for less money (about $3,000 down to $2,500 a month). That cut top line by ~$500k a month and raised costs.4 Churn didn’t change at all, because $2,500 was still past the “this is a lot of money” threshold. The first comment from customers was a complaint that he hadn’t done it sooner. He puts the lost profit at $6–7M a year and ~$50M of exit value. The competitor later went out of business because its pricing wasn’t profitable.5 His advice to a motocross-camp owner facing a copycat was the same: focus on the customer and let the copycat chase low-margin dates.6

Price ceiling in coaching. Hormozi says done-with-you coaching offers like a real-estate investing programme usually sell for $15–25k, with a $100k turnkey tier. “No one in my market can afford it” usually means the founder has only pitched the ~200 warm people a year who come through word of mouth.7

Disagreements / caveats

See also

Footnotes

  1. The Mathematics of Business, Explained @ 00:56 — Alex Hormozi ↩

  2. The Mathematics of Business, Explained @ 02:30 — Alex Hormozi ↩ ↩2

  3. The Mathematics of Business, Explained @ 04:02 — Alex Hormozi ↩

  4. Helping 4 Educational Business Owners Build a $1M Business in 25 Minutes @ 10:30 — Alex Hormozi ↩

  5. Helping 4 Educational Business Owners Build a $1M Business in 25 Minutes @ 11:18 — Alex Hormozi ↩

  6. Helping 4 Educational Business Owners Build a $1M Business in 25 Minutes @ 08:46 — Alex Hormozi ↩

  7. Helping 4 Educational Business Owners Build a $1M Business in 25 Minutes @ 05:32 — Alex Hormozi ↩